Thursday, April 26, 2012

Guest Post: “What about historical fiction?” by J. Anderson Coats

Please help me welcome Class of 2k12's J. Anderson Coats! She wrote THE WICKED AND THE JUST which was released on April 17th and has written a great post about historical fiction.



The other day, I went to Curriculum Night at my teenage son’s middle school, and I happened to talk with some girls in his language arts class about books. I asked them what they liked to read and I got the answers I expected – Divergent, The Hunger Games – but out of curiosity, I asked, “What about historical fiction?”

One girl wrinkled her nose. “No. Ew.”

I couldn’t resist. “Why not?”

Another girl was more tactful. “You know. School.”

Yes, I do know. And I don’t blame anyone raised on “social studies” and sanitized school-friendly history for that reaction. But if you like dystopian secondary worlds like these girls seemed to, let me tell you something: the best-kept secret about history is that the past is the ultimate secondary world.

You can’t get more dystopian than the rubber plantations in the Belgian Congo where they’d cut off people’s hands and kidnap their families to ensure that quotas were met, or the transportation of petty criminals to a prison colony on the other side of the planet. These things are real, and they give fiction a run for its money every time.

Here’s a little quiz: which of the following are plot summaries of recent YA novels, and which are actual historical events?

* The daughter of a gladiator must marry the fighter who kills her father and captures her dowry bracelet.

* When her wealthy husband dies, a teenage widow must climb on his funeral pyre with him and be burned alive, or else face recrimination, ostracism and destitution.

* During a seemingly unstoppable plague, a city closes its gates and forbids anyone to enter or leave, and any houses in which plague suffers already live are boarded up with the healthy and sick alike trapped inside.

* Girls who reach legal maturity are given a special tattoo that indicates their sexual availability to the entire society.

Answers:

1 – Dystopian (Girl in the Arena by Lise Haines)

2 – Historical (pre-British India; the practice of sati)

3 – Historical (14th century Milan)

4 – Dystopian (XVI by Julia Karr)

Even if you got all the answers right, it’s hard to ignore the fact that the similarities between the past and fictional secondary worlds are striking. Our shared human past is filled with betrayal and revenge and despair and joy and stupidity, and one of the best ways to access it is through well-crafted, well-researched, engaging fiction.

The best historical fiction challenges readers’ assumptions about what “history” is, and how we in the present relate to people who lived the past. It doesn’t judge the past based on our modern standards, but it renders the past – where women were property and animal cruelty was funny - normal and familiar. It’s the same challenge faced by writers who set stories in other types of secondary worlds, but historical-fiction writers have the additional hurdle of social studies to overcome.

But the best historical fiction tells a good story, too, where characters we care about have to deal with some type of issue that feels relatable. It’s not just a chronicle of the stuff that happened. So much of history is interpretation. The narrative has to take evidence into account, but at its heart it’s still a narrative.

The best historical fiction is out there, and it ain’t social studies. There are echoes of the dystopian and traces of the stranger-than-fiction. There is tragedy and adversity and also hope, because it is human. The best historical fiction may surprise you.

Thank you so much to J. Anderson Coats for visiting. Remember you can pick up a copy of THE WICKED AND THE JUST today. You can also find her online at http://www.jandersoncoats.com/

9 comments:

  1. J, you speak the truth, "...the past is the ultimate secondary world." Well written historical fiction is just as engaging as fantasy/dysopia/scifi!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. So true! I love well-written historical fiction. Sometimes the worlds and situations are so strange it really does read like fantasy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a great post. And I will defintely look this book up. Thanks Cari

    ReplyDelete
  4. I personally LOVE historical fiction. She perfectly described what I find appealing about historical fiction. I have this one on my shelf to read very soon!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I love historical (YA) fiction. I'd say about 20% of my favourites consist of historicals, and that's due to the lack of HF there is compared to other genres.

    I can understand why people do tend to shy away from the genre though. Some HF CAN read a bit stiff and make you feel like you're reading a history text for school. I think after I graduated and didn't *have* to study history anymore my love for the genre grew because I was able to read about different historical points for entertainment, rather than to pass that test.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I grew up on stories of my parents, grandparents, friends of fmaily about living under and/or escaping the Nazi and Communist regimes. Many dystopians seem kind of tame in comparison...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And there are an increasing number of books about those subjects: BREAKING STALIN'S NOSE, BETWEEN SHADES OF GREY, ESCAPING THE TIGER, UNDER A RED SKY, I WANT TO LIVE, ESCAPING GLORYTOWN

      Delete
  7. Such a great post! I think that's what I've always loved about historical fiction--the fact that it takes me out of the world I live in and gives me the chance to experience something different, something that I could never have the chance to experience otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  8. +JMJ+

    What a great point about all the "dystopias" we have already lived through! I personally believe that our own modern world is a dystopia and that most of us are just in denial about it--but until I came across this post, I never considered the past. Great food for thought! Thanks. =)

    ReplyDelete